Abstract The onslaught of homosexuality legalization movements and initiatives has presented the society with a barrage of questions — dilemmas, even — regarding its moral and political sides. Legalization of same-sex marriage is a highly divisive issue and often pits former friends, neighbors and even relatives against each other. Whereas some people believe that same-sex marriage is an unnatural and unhealthy phenomenon, activists exhorting its legalization hold fast to the opposite opinion. Marriage, for years has been argued that the rights to it or strictly only between a man and a women. Both sexes are assumed to marry someone of the opposite sex.
Argument Against The Legalization Of Homosexual Marriage
The Case Against Encouraging Polygamy Is Strong - The Atlantic
It is clear, however, that the Bible condemns homosexuality as an immoral and unnatural sin. Leviticus identifies homosexual sex as an abomination, a detestable sin. Every mention of marriage in the Bible refers to the union of a male and a female. The first mention of marriage, Genesis , describes it as a man leaving his parents and being united to his wife.
Why We Oppose Same-Sex Marriage
While marriage has traditionally been prescribed as a union between heterosexuals, there has been a shift towards giving marriage rights to homosexual couples. This change has been brought about by the prevalence of homosexuality in the society and the widespread acceptance of gay relations. While at the onset of the last century homosexuality was shunned and even criminalized, the s saw many states making laws that decriminalized same-sex conduct and abolished discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation Volokh Gathering from this momentum, gay activists have been calling for the legalizing of gay marriages and the affording of gay couples the same rights and benefits as their heterosexual counterparts. Due to media popularization of gay rights, opposition of gay rights to marriage is normally equated to intolerance.
There are numerous footnotes throughout the article. He views marriage and religion as a choice that should not be interfered with by government. His opinions are obvious because although he does mention both sides of the argument, his support of polygamist marriage is evident by his numerous attempts to steer the reader to his point of view. There are no advertisements in the scholarly journal.